Analyst sees no major impact to Apple’s stock if it is forced to make changes to App Store policies

0

In some markets outside the U.S., Apple is being forced to make changes to its long-time policy that prevents developers from promoting third-party in-app payment platforms. This policy has enabled Apple to collect its 15% to 30% cut of in-app revenue generated by the App Store. A big change to Apple’s policies took place on March 30th when the company announced that “reader” apps can send subscribers links to membership sites where customers can sign up for service or otherwise manage their accounts.

Reader apps are apps whose main functionality is to deliver content like magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, or video. For example, streaming music service Spotify would be considered in that group. Spotify is one of the companies that complained the most about Apple’s in-app payment policy going as far as not allowing subscribers to switch from the free ad-supported service to the premium paid service through the App Store.
Apple agreed to the change just to get the Japanese Fair Trade Commission to drop its antitrust investigation. And another legal battle that is forcing Apple to change its policy is coming from the Netherlands where an antitrust watchdog ruled that Apple’s actions in not allowing alternative payment platforms to process transactions related to dating apps are anti-competitive.

According to AppleInsider, JP Morgan analyst Samik Chatterjee says that the long-term effect of Apple allowing third-party platforms to handle transactions for reader apps would be less than you might expect. The analyst says that the top 10 reader apps make up less than 8% of the total revenue of those apps. The top 20 account for about 10%, and the top 50 account for 13%.

The bottom line, Apple will not hurt its bottom line by allowing third-party payment platforms to handle transactions for these apps. Chatterjee says, “This suggests that in a worst case scenario where all reader app consumers circumvent App Store payments altogether, which we see as highly unlikely, the impact would be limited to 1-2% of EPS.”

The translation? Apple should not fear having to give up its 15% to 30% cut on those apps and neither should investors.

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE NEWS

 

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! TechnoCodex is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a comment